Ashley Kannan Certified Educator I think that any nation's relationship to imperialism and colonialism is directly dependent on how one views the reality of the time period. From the point of view who were colonized, I think a strong case could be made that the United States was not justified.
Expansionism had no problems justifying it; however in the wisdom of hindsight, it is hardly justifiable. The belief at the time was that U.
The then belief was that the U. This was primarily an excuse, although most people of the day bought into it wholesale. Those involved at the time of U.
The United States had overspread the North American continent pursuant to a policy of "Manifest Destiny," that is God willed that America do just that.
Carrying that culture to the rest of the world seemed the next logical step. The true reasons were a bit more mundane. The Canal was built through Panama after the U. The coaling station was, of course Hawaii, where American sugar magnates had overthrown the rightful queen with the help of U.
Marines, established the Republic of Hawaii with a constitution which specified that the country would seek annexation by the United States. At the time, the U. The Hawaiian pear is now fully ripe and this is the golden hour for the United States to pluck it.
There were economic reasons also: Exports of farm products had been the basis of American economic growth. The original colonies only survived on the basis of exporting tobacco, indigo, lumber, etc.
Throughout the 19th century, cotton, corn, wheat, etc. Now, technology had led to improved methods of transportation and communication, commerce moved much more quickly. There was a growing belief that American manufacturers had grown to the point that they too could compete, perhaps even outsell foreign manufacturers in the World Market.
Maine, which was untrue.
So, can it be justified? Only if self interest is considered a proper motive.Get an answer for 'Was the United States justified in their Imperialistic policies of the late 's and early 's? Social, Economic and Military reasons for expansionism' and find homework. Jul 09, · Was the United States justified in their imperialistic policies of the late s and early s?
And Why did the United States shift from expanding internally towards foreign expansion in the late s and early s?Status: Resolved. Jul 17, · Best Answer: Ending paragraph: "Therefore the above paragraphs prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the United States were, or were not (depending on the circumstances) justified in their imperialistic policies of the late s and early s."Status: Resolved.
Jan 25, · Was the United States justified in their imperialistic policies of the late s and early s? Answer Questions Scale factor between the trapezoids is GH= 6centimeter= 8 centimeter and AB is three times the length of DC.?Status: Resolved.
Jul 09, · Was the United States justified in their imperialistic policies of the late s and early s? And Why did the United States shift from expanding internally towards foreign expansion in the late s and early s?Status: Resolved.
In the late ’s and early ’s, the United States went through an era of imperialism. At the time, the US was quite powerful, but was looking to continue to spread their territory, make themselves even stronger, and have multiple trade routes to have all the resources they needed and wanted.