Today, I list my top 15 quotes from that one-man show of fundamentalist nutjobbery, Kent Hovind! Right away, you know this is gonna be good. That old trickster, Satan In the twentieth century the major attack Satan has launched has been against the first eleven chapters of Genesis. Holy crap, he believes in Satan?
Background[ edit ] The Doctor of Philosophy Ph. Completing a PhD takes an average of 8.
Upon completion of a final draft, a defense is held where the public is invited and the candidate defends his or her work in front of the committee, who ask questions and make comments.
If approved, the committee signs off on the work at the defense and it is required to be stored in that university's library. Like any other publication in a library, dissertations are available to anyone who wants to read them.
This is not the case for Hovind's dissertation. Firstly, Hovind's dissertation was not publicly available. Hovind claims to have lost his copy of the dissertation,  while Patriot Bible University does not make dissertations available.
A copy of Hovind's dissertation was obtained by Skip Evans, who "receive[d] the original document, complete with a taped-in clipping from a magazine. She found Hovind's dissertation makes no useful contribution to scholarship, except perhaps as an example of how not to write one.
Hovind's alma mater is not accredited by any U. Department of Education—recognised body, and his degrees are not Hovind thesis any status in the academic or scientific mainstream.
Hovind's dissertation is approved by only one person: D are allowed to prefix their name with "Dr". However, many choose not to do so out of modesty or so their expertise in nuclear physics, history, or philosophy doesn't get mistaken when a medical doctor is actually required.
Hovind, needless to say, has no such modesty Hovind thesis refers to himself as Dr. Kent Hovind or Dr. In fact, he even used the prefix in Pensacola, Florida's phone book.
D vs Ben Goldacre. He traces this through ancient Greek philosophy, eastern religions, and the Church Fathers. He gets large chunks of this ancient history wrong, and what little bits of truth do sneak in are surrounded by oceans of irrelevance and idiocy.
SocratesHovind tells us, didn't write "many" books. Socrates didn't write any books, and is infamous for asserting that one shouldn't write books! Hovind describes Socrates, Platoand Aristotle as being " pantheists ," and thus attempts to understand in modern terms a religious system that does not easily match modern expectations and categories.
If you want to apply a modern label, polytheism catches the spirit a lot better than pantheism. There are some ancient philosophers you can describe as holding broadly pantheistic ideas: Hovind fails when he attempts to understand Plato and Socrates, ascribing positions to them that are held by participants in Platonic dialogues, most of which feature Socrates as a character, but only some of the dialogues can be thought of as containing the Socrates of history, while the others have Socrates as a literary tool that Plato can use.
Hovind asserts that Democrates is the founder of Atomism, rather than Democritus. Most scholars actually state it was much earlier, around BCE. He completely misunderstands Zoroastrian beliefs, claiming that the essence of it is that "Satan and God are equally powerful.
According to Hovind, in Zoroastrianism "a lack of importance [is] placed on God.
Kent hovind thesis 10 out of 10 based on ratings. Do Not be Unequally Yoked Together with Unbelievers. He has preached in every state and over 30 foreign countries defending the scientific accuracy of the Bible Award-winning jewelry designer Karin business plan convenience store Jamieson created her Rose Quartz collection so that the wearer always has a moment of serenity nearby. Kent Kovind Hovind is a well-known "young-earth" biblical creationist. As such the strength of his dissertation is of broad interest. According to our source, contrary to accepted practices in academia where doctoral dissertations are available to the public. 1 Inside the Mind of a Creationist A Critical Analysis of Kent Hovind's “Doctoral Dissertation” By Nathan Dickey* 1. Meet Kent Hovind Kent Hovind is a young-earth creationist who subscribes to some of the most outlandish notions one can hope to find in the biblical creationist movement.
Which is fine, except for the fact that if the ancient Greeks, Zoroastrians, and eastern mystics were all budding proto-Darwinists, you might expect some historians and philosophers who study the ancients to have spotted it — and that the work of Darwin and Wallace in the nineteenth century might have been a bit less revolutionary and surprising than it actually was.
Ditto with the Comte de Buffon, who supposedly "was very influential in spreading the doctrine of evolution around the world", this after a long paragraph discussing "Voltair".
Hovind claims that HinduismZoroastrianism, BuddhismTaoismand Confucianismwhich all are really evolution cults in disguise, made it easy for Communism to take over in China. How this is possible is not known. Evolution was not initially researched till the s.
On the same note, Communism has spread really well in Iranian Zoroastrian communities and in Indiawhere Hinduism and Buddhism are prevalent. This hypothesis also explains the resistance to Chinese Communism by the Tibetan Buddhist monks really well, and the religious history of Russia and Cuba.
In reality, the survival of the fittest found in Capitalist market economics has more to do with natural selection than the Communist ideal of "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.
He also makes some pretty silly remarks about the Church Fathers which are backed up with the same sort of evidence as everything else in the dissertation — that is, about the same quality and quantity as you get in a Chick tract or the Weekly World News.
The following are quotes found in Kent Hovind's thesis.Patriot Bible University (PBU), formerly known as Patriot University, is an unaccredited Independent Baptist correspondence school located in Del Norte, Colorado which issues religious degrees only.
According to the State of Colorado, Patriot's "degrees or diplomas have no state recognition". . Kent hovind dissertation nj. Animal abuse essay thesis how to write a thesis statement for a summary essay medieval setting description essay middle east conflicts essays.
Short essay on honesty is the best policy government research paper quora art and artifice and other essays of illusion pdf file.
Kent Hovind Kent's site disappeared in This site won an Encouragement Award in the Millenium Awards. The award citation read: Something old became new again this week when Wikileaks breathlessly reported that the PhD thesis of creationist Mr Kent Hovind had finally been made available to the world.
1 Inside the Mind of a Creationist A Critical Analysis of Kent Hovind's “Doctoral Dissertation” By Nathan Dickey* 1.
Kent Hovind Kent's site disappeared in This site won an Encouragement Award in the Millenium Awards. The award citation read: Something old became new again this week when Wikileaks breathlessly reported that the PhD thesis of creationist Mr Kent Hovind had finally been made available to the world. Kent Hovind is an embarressment to thinking Christians, who acknowledge growing knowledge of God’s creative/sustaining work, and who apply appropriate scriptural studies to the issues. Genesis 1 conveys truth to an Egyptian-educated Hebrew in . At this point, it should be clear that there is no amount of evidence that Kent Hovind will accept. Every time I see this disaster of a dissertation, I always think it should be signed Kent “The Yellow Dart” Hovind.
Meet Kent Hovind Kent Hovind is a young-earth creationist who subscribes to some of the most outlandish notions one can hope to find in the biblical creationist movement. Kent E. Hovind (born January 15, ) is an American Christian fundamentalist evangelist and tax caninariojana.com is a controversial figure in the Young Earth creationist movement whose ministry focuses on denial of scientific theories in the fields of biology (), geophysics, and cosmology in favor of a literalist interpretation of the Genesis creation .
At this point, it should be clear that there is no amount of evidence that Kent Hovind will accept. Every time I see this disaster of a dissertation, I always think it should be signed Kent “The Yellow Dart” Hovind.